Throughout the history of mankind, the non-psychopathic people with the capability of violence have kept the psychopaths in line.  For all their bluster and bluff the psychopaths are weak of mind. Unlike sadists, psychopaths do not harm the harmless simply because they get pleasure from it (though they may). Psychopaths want things. If harming others helps them get what they want, so be it. They can act this way because they are less likely to feel pity or remorse or fear.

 

The psychopaths of history who were responsible for millions of unnecessary deaths were Mao, Hitler, Stalin and Mussolini.  If the millions of dead people had their time again, I bet they wish they had stood up before it was too late.  The would-be psychopaths of our time are Gore, Thunberg, Monbiot, and anyone else who thinks reducing food and energy availability to a growing population is a good idea.  Make no mistake that these abhorrent ideologies will result in the suffering on billions of our world's most venerable people – the ones the developed world should be lifting, not sacrificing on the alter of the carbon cult.  The genocidal comment that the planet has too many people is the worst form of human racism.

 

The world's population is forecast to maybe reach 9 billion people then it will fall off a cliff.  As populations develop, people have less children, urbanization results in less children, and as soon as you educate women birth rates go down.  The replacement rate to maintain a population is 2.1 children per woman.  The western world can only maintain its population through immigration.    The relationship between population growth and global wealth is extremely positive.  The despots pushing this man-made global warming sham are trying to make themselves rich and powerful beyond their capability and right at the expense of humanity and the planet. If we want to fix the worlds environmental problems, we should do so by lifting the poorest out of poverty by providing them with affordable energy and food.  The population will self-regulate through economic prosperity, we do not need genocidal agendas to expedite this.

 

National or international psychopaths never articulate their end agenda, they start with emotive fear and build on that.  University of Texas ecologist Eric Pianka told a meeting of the Texas Academy of Science that "90 percent of his fellow human beings must die in order to save the planet". Professor Bill McGwire, best-selling author of HOTHOUSE EARTH: AN INHABITANT'S GUIDE." Said "If I'm being brutally honest, the only realistic way I see emissions falling as fast as they need to, to avoid catastrophic climate breakdown (the latest alarmist dogmatic talking point), is the culling of the human population by a pandemic with a very high fatality rate." Back in 2010, the influential climate scientist James Lovelock suggested that it "may be necessary to put democracy on hold for a while" to curb emissions.  The non-psychopaths amongst us should be speaking up against these genocidal agendas.

 

In agriculture anything which reduces the productivity or population of cattle should be spoken up against.  I have heard a meth dealer (the ones who have supplements to reduce cattle methane) say that the best way to reduce methane is to feed cattle less!!  The CN30 agenda was a poorly thought-out marketing stunt which should be abandoned by the industry as a matter of urgency.  Back of the envelope figures in 2017 would have told us the only way under current accounting to reach CN30 was to put every single bovine in feedlots on suppressive supplements and plant the entire continent to trees.  The 65% decrease in baseline measurements from 2005 have next to nothing to do with the MLA publicity stunt and can be mostly attributed to the economic efforts from the Stud Stock industry and nutrition fields driving efficiency and conversion rates. 

 

The livestock industry has a duty of responsibility to stand up against the psychopaths who want to reduce available food for humans.  The current banning of sheep live exports which provide sustenance and nutrition to nations who need imported food to sustain their population is deplorable.  Reducing cattle numbers to lower biogenic methane is idiotic.  The termite population in northern Australia releases more methane than the cattle population does.  Why our industry is spending our money on a problem which quite simply does not exist is incomprehensible.  We should be spending the money on education and informing our consumers. 

 

Leave the climate alarmists to it, we are not going to change them.  Engage farmer to farmer and then farmer to consumer, if we do not choose the narrative for our industry the animal activists and climate change scaremongers will choose the narrative – I can assure you it is not for the benefit of our industry or humanity.  If your industry leaders are not going to unite us, we will have to do it ourselves.  www.onfarm.co has the functionality to let you do this at an online and scalable way.

 

George King

Carcoar